Artistic illustration of a pulsar trailing a long, narrow X-ray tail aligned with a diffuse ultra-high-energy gamma-ray glow.

Einstein Probe and LHAASO Trace a 13-Parsec Pulsar Tail Along Ultra-High-Energy Gamma Rays

Joint Einstein Probe and LHAASO observations of PSR J1740+1000 reveal a 13-parsec X-ray tail aligned with an elongated ultra-high-energy gamma-ray source, suggesting that electrons and positrons above 100 TeV escape the pulsar wind nebula along an ordered path rather than diffusing immediately.

Aug 8, 2026

About 4,600 light-years away, a middle-aged neutron star called PSR J1740+1000 is ploughing through the interstellar medium. It has a characteristic age of about 114,000 years and sheds rotational energy at a rate of 2.3 × 10^35 ergs per second. That outflow creates a bow-shock pulsar wind nebula: a cometary cloud of high-energy particles and magnetic fields trailing behind the moving pulsar. XMM-Newton had previously traced only the inner portion of that tail, extending about 6 arcminutes to the southwest. Farther downstream, the picture was stranger. LHAASO had found an ultra-high-energy gamma-ray source, LHAASO J1740+0948, first detected at 17.1σ above 25 TeV. It was offset from both the pulsar and the previously known X-ray tail—but lay along the tail's extrapolated direction.

That offset was awkward. In the standard picture, electrons and positrons escape a pulsar wind nebula and diffuse roughly equally in all directions into the interstellar medium. If that were true, the gamma-ray glow should not line up so neatly with a narrow X-ray tail. Another possibility was that particles are re-accelerated in the tail, which would also complicate the simple escape picture.

A 13-Parsec X-ray Tail Meets LHAASO's Gamma-Ray Glow

To test those ideas, researchers combined new X-ray observations from the Einstein Probe (EP) satellite with updated gamma-ray data from LHAASO, the Large High Altitude Air Shower Observatory. EP's Follow-up X-ray Telescope (FXT) observed the region for about 71,000 seconds. FXT has an approximately 1-degree field of view and an exceptionally low instrumental particle background, which helps it detect faint, diffuse X-rays. After removing point-like sources and smoothing the image, the team found an X-ray filament extending southwest from the pulsar out to about 32 arcminutes. At the pulsar's distance of 1.4 kiloparsecs, that is roughly 13 parsecs—far longer than the structure previously seen by XMM-Newton.

LHAASO detects ultra-high-energy gamma rays by catching the air showers they trigger in Earth's atmosphere. In over 1,944 days of data from its KM2A array and over 1,484 days from its WCDA array, the source appears extended above 10 TeV. The updated data favor an extended, elliptical shape over a point source at 3.9σ, and the major axis points along the same direction as the EP X-ray tail. The authors report this as the first detection of an X-ray pulsar tail associated with a spatially coincident extended ultra-high-energy gamma-ray source.

One Electron Population, Two Kinds of Light

The authors treat the alignment as more than a geometric curiosity: they test whether one electron population can power both bands. X-rays and gamma rays from this system can be produced by the same population of relativistic electrons. The electrons spiral around magnetic field lines and emit synchrotron radiation, which appears as X-rays. The same electrons can also scatter low-energy photons up to gamma-ray energies through inverse Compton scattering.

When the team modeled the X-ray and gamma-ray spectra together, a single electron population fit both bands. The model implies a magnetic field of about 3 microgauss, close to the typical interstellar value, with no significant variation along the tail. The gamma-ray surface brightness declines with distance as S ∝ r^-0.55, and the authors find a good correlation with the X-ray brightness. A uniform distribution of electrons along the tail is ruled out at about 4.3σ confidence. The simplest explanation, the authors argue, is that the X-rays and gamma rays come from the same escaping electrons, without requiring particle re-acceleration during propagation. They note, however, that re-acceleration cannot be completely excluded.

A Magnetic Highway or a Fast Outflow

The larger conclusion concerns how particles leave the accelerator. The data indicate that electrons and positrons above 100 TeV, or 100 trillion electron volts, are escaping the pulsar wind nebula. Instead of immediately diffusing isotropically, they travel anisotropically over at least about 10 parsecs. Anisotropic means the transport is not the same in every direction; it is favored along an ordered path.

Two scenarios could produce that path. In one, the particles diffuse mainly along background magnetic field lines. In the other, they are carried by an advective outflow, a fast stream of material moving down the tail. In the advective scenario, the average flow speed must be at least about 2,700 kilometers per second, much faster than the pulsar's proper motion of at most about 400 kilometers per second. In that advective picture, the tail is not created by the pulsar's proper motion but by a faster outflow from the accelerator. For the diffusion scenario, the implied diffusion coefficient along the magnetic field is at least 10^28 square centimeters per second, roughly two orders of magnitude lower than standard interstellar diffusion for 100 TeV particles. That is similar to values inferred for extended TeV halos around other pulsars.

The study is an arXiv preprint, and its central physical picture still has room for debate. The two transport scenarios—magnetic guidance versus advective outflow—are not yet distinguishable with current data. The magnetic field strength and its uniformity come from spectral modeling rather than direct measurement. The tail's true length could be longer than it appears because the viewing angle is unknown; the 13 parsecs is a projected distance. And while re-acceleration is not needed, it remains a possibility. The paper says that precise measurements of the intensity and photon-index profiles in both X-ray and gamma-ray bands could help tell the two scenarios apart. It also notes that farther out, the diffuse X-ray emission currently cannot be significantly distinguished from the background.

For cosmic rays, the lesson is that leaving home may not mean instantly joining the great isotropic sea. A pulsar can send its particles down a magnetic highway or a fast outflow for many parsecs before they mix into the surrounding medium. The 13-parsec tail of PSR J1740+1000 is a visible trace of that handoff—and a reminder that how cosmic rays escape their accelerators shapes where they show up across the Galaxy.

Anisotropic Particle Transport from a Pulsar Wind Nebula Revealed by Einstein Probe and LHAASOZhen Cao, F. Aharonian, Y. X. Bai, Y. W. Bao, D. Bastieri, X. J. Bi, Y. J. Bi, W. Bian, J. Blunier, A. V. Bukevich, C. M. Cai, W. Y. Cao, Zhe Cao, J. Chang, J. F. Chang, E. S. Chen, G. H. Chen, H. K. Chen, L. F. Chen, Liang Chen, Long Chen, M. J. Chen, M. L. Chen, Q. H. Chen, S. Chen, S. H. Chen, S. Z. Chen, T. L. Chen, X. B. Chen, X. J. Chen, X. P. Chen, Yang Chen, Yong Chen, N. Cheng, Q. Y. Cheng, Y. D. Cheng, Y. H. Chi, M. Y. Cui, S. W. Cui, X. H. Cui, Y. D. Cui, B. Z. Dai, H. L. Dai, L. X. Dai, Z. G. Dai, Danzengluobu, Y. X. Diao, A. J. Dong, X. D. Duan, J. H. Fan, Y. Z. Fan, J. Fang, J. H. Fang, K. Fang, C. F. Feng, H. Feng, L. Feng, S. H. Feng, X. T. Feng, Y. Feng, Y. L. Feng, S. Gabici, B. Gao, Q. Gao, W. Gao, C. Ge, M. M. Ge, T. T. Ge, L. S. Geng, G. Giacinti, G. H. Gong, Q. B. Gou, M. H. Gu, W. M. Gu, F. L. Guo, J. Guo, K. J. Guo, X. L. Guo, Y. Q. Guo, R. P. Han, O. A. Hannuksela, M. Hasan, H. H. He, H. N. He, J. Y. He, X. Y. He, Y. He, S. Hernández-Cadena, C. Hou, X. Hou, H. B. Hu, S. C. Hu, D. H. Huang, F. Huang, J. J. Huang, X. L. Huang, X. T. Huang, X. Y. Huang, Y. Huang, Z. J. Huang, A. Inventar, X. L. Ji, H. Y. Jia, K. Jia, S. M. Jia, H. B. Jiang, K. Jiang, X. W. Jiang, Z. J. Jiang, C. C. Jin, M. Jin, S. Kaci, M. M. Kang, I. Karpikov, D. Khangulyan, D. Kuleshov, K. Kurinov, W. H. Lei, Cheng Li, C. K. Li, Cong Li, D. Li, F. Li, H. B. Li, H. C. Li, Jian Li, Jie Li, K. Li, L. Li, R. L. Li, T. Y. Li, W. L. Li, X. R. Li, X. Y. Li, Y. Li, Zhe Li, Zhuo Li, E. W. Liang, Y. F. Liang, S. J. Lin, B. Liu, C. Liu, D. Liu, D. B. Liu, H. Liu, J. Liu, J. L. Liu, J. R. Liu, M. Y. Liu, Q. Liu, R. Y. Liu, S. M. Liu, T. Liu, W. Liu, Y. Liu, Y. Liu, Yuan Liu, Y. N. Liu, Y. Q. Lou, Q. Luo, Y. Luo, H. K. Lv, B. Q. Ma, L. L. Ma, X. H. Ma, I. O. Maliy, J. R. Mao, Z. Min, W. Mitthumsiri, Y. Mizuno, G. B. Mou, A. Neronov, C. -Y. Ng, K. C. Y. Ng, M. Y. Ni, L. Nie, L. J. Ou, Z. W. Ou, H. W. Pan, P. Pattarakijwanich, Z. Y. Pei, D. Y. Peng, J. C. Qi, M. Y. Qi, J. J. Qin, H. Qu, A. Raza, C. Y. Ren, M. Q. Ruan, D. Ruffolo, A. Sáiz, D. Savchenko, D. Semikoz, L. Shao, O. Shchegolev, Y. Z. Shen, X. D. Sheng, F. W. Shu, H. C. Song, Yu. V. Stenkin, Y. Su, C. Y. Sun, D. X. Sun, H. Sun, J. X. Sun, M. Sun, Q. N. Sun, X. N. Sun, Z. B. Sun, N. H. Tabasam, J. Takata, P. H. T. Tam, H. B. Tan, Q. W. Tang, R. Tang, Z. B. Tang, L. Tao, W. W. Tian, C. N. Tong, L. H. Wan, C. Wang, D. H. Wang, G. W. Wang, H. G. Wang, J. C. Wang, J. F. Wang, J. S. Wang, K. Wang, Kai Wang, Kai Wang, L. P. Wang, L. Y. Wang, W. Wang, X. G. Wang, X. J. Wang, X. Y. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. D. Wang, Z. H. Wang, Z. X. Wang, Zheng Wang, D. M. Wei, J. J. Wei, Y. J. Wei, T. Wen, S. S. Weng, C. Y. Wu, H. R. Wu, Q. W. Wu, S. Wu, X. F. Wu, Y. S. Wu, S. Q. Xi, J. Xia, G. M. Xiang, D. X. Xiao, G. Xiao, Y. F. Xiao, B. H. Xie, F. Xie, Y. L. Xin, H. D. Xing, Y. Xing, D. R. Xiong, B. N. Xu, C. Y. Xu, D. L. Xu, R. X. Xu, S. S. Xu, L. Xue, D. H. Yan, T. Yan, C. Yang, C. Y. Yang, F. F. Yang, L. L. Yang, M. J. Yang, R. Z. Yang, W. X. Yang, Z. H. Yang, Z. G. Yao, X. A. Ye, L. Q. Yin, N. Yin, X. H. You, Z. Y. You, Y. H. Yu, Q. Yuan, W. M. Yuan, H. Yue, H. D. Zeng, T. X. Zeng, W. Zeng, X. T. Zeng, M. Zha, B. Zhang, B. B. Zhang, B. T. Zhang, C. Zhang, H. Zhang, H. M. Zhang, H. Y. Zhang, J. Zhang, J. L. Zhang, J. Y. Zhang, L. Y. Zhang, Li Zhang, P. F. Zhang, R. Zhang, R. Y. Zhang, S. R. Zhang, S. S. Zhang, S. Y. Zhang, W. Zhang, X. Zhang, X. L. Zhang, X. P. Zhang, Yi Zhang, Yong Zhang, Z. P. Zhang, H. S. Zhao, J. Zhao, L. Zhao, L. Z. Zhao, X. H. Zhao, F. Zheng, T. C. Zheng, B. Zhou, H. Zhou, J. N. Zhou, L. Zhou, M. Zhou, P. Zhou, R. Zhou, X. X. Zhou, X. X. Zhou, B. Y. Zhu, C. G. Zhu, F. R. Zhu, H. Zhu, K. J. Zhu, Y. F. Zhu, Z. F. Zhu, Y. C. Zou, X. Zuohttps://arxiv.org/abs/2608.07850v1