A More Inclusive Dark Fluid: SKA and Euclid Forecasts Show a Hard Path to Test Modified Gravity

Imagine trying to hear a whisper during a hurricane. That is roughly the challenge cosmologists face when they try to tell whether dark energy is a simple cosmological constant—the Λ in ΛCDM—or something more complicated that changes how gravity behaves across the universe.

A new preprint by Ziad Sakr, posted to arXiv on 23 January 2026, explores how well two upcoming surveys could meet that challenge. The paper does not report a detection. Instead, it forecasts what the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) and the Euclid space telescope might see when they combine forces. The answer is sobering: even with next-generation instruments, the deviation from ΛCDM in a generalized model of modified gravity may only be detectable at about the 2-sigma level.

A Cosmological Constant, or Something More?

The paper's fiducial cosmology takes Ω_m,0 = 0.32 and Ω_b,0 = 0.05 (with h = 0.67), close to the familiar ΛCDM inventory of about 68% dark energy, 27% dark matter, and 5% ordinary matter. Dark energy is usually described by a single number: its equation of state parameter, w, the ratio of its pressure to its energy density. For a cosmological constant, w = -1 exactly. That simple value fits a wide range of observations.

But recent results from the DESI survey have shown a preference for a dynamical dark energy equation of state over a simple cosmological constant. If confirmed, that would be a revolution. Many alternative models—including modified-gravity and effective-fluid approaches—have been proposed to explain dark energy while also altering how structures grow. The trouble is that these theories often introduce several new parameters, making them hard to test.

Sakr's paper proposes a more inclusive way to package those effects into a single number: an effective dark fluid equation of state, w_eff. This parameter is designed to capture changes in both the universe's background expansion and the growth of large-scale structure. It connects w_eff to three modified-gravity parameters: μ0, which modifies the strength of gravity in the Newtonian potential equation; η0, the gravitational slip parameter, which describes a mismatch between two gravitational potentials; and H0,bck, a late-time modification to the expansion rate.

One Number to Capture Modified Gravity

The idea is elegant. Instead of trying to measure each modified-gravity parameter separately, the forecast projects them onto a single w_eff. That reduces the number of degrees of freedom and tightens the expected bounds by about 30%. After projection, the paper finds, the uncertainty on w_eff becomes comparable to the uncertainties on standard cosmological parameters such as the matter density and the Hubble constant.

But there is a catch. The projection improves the constraints for both a universe far from ΛCDM and one close to it. So while the error bars shrink, the ability to tell the two scenarios apart does not improve much. The author considered two mock universes: one where the intermediate modified-gravity parameters deviate from ΛCDM by about 10%, which still yields w_eff = -1.03; and another that is sub-percent close to ΛCDM. Both are tantalizingly close to the cosmological constant.

What SKA and Euclid Could See

To forecast the surveys' power, Sakr used a statistical technique called a Fisher matrix. This does not analyze real data. It estimates how well a given experiment could measure parameters, based on its specifications and the way it maps the sky. The study adopts next-stage SKA specifications—including radio continuum galaxy clustering and lensing, HI spectroscopic clustering, and intensity mapping—and combines them with a Euclid-like survey similar to the expected DR3 release.

The forecasts show that with SKA alone, the deviation from ΛCDM in the three modified-gravity parameters could be detected at only about 1 sigma—a weak hint, not a discovery. Adding Euclid improves that to roughly 2 sigma, still not a high-confidence detection. The synergy helps: Euclid's photometric and spectroscopic observations complement SKA's radio measurements, and together they reduce the uncertainties on cosmological parameters.

Yet the paper concludes that a highly generalized model like this one, even though it affects both the expansion history and the growth of structure, will be hard to disentangle from ΛCDM at the level of these forecasts. The author writes that data from more advanced stages of the surveys will be needed to hope for that goal. The forecast keeps to a conservative regime, staying at the linear level for the main analysis: ℓ≈750 for angular probes and k_max≈0.15 h Mpc−1 for clustering, so the smallest nonlinear scales are not used.

The Long Game for Dark Energy

This is not a failure. It is a realistic assessment of how subtle the problem is. The next generation of surveys will be powerful, but dark energy's secrets are hidden in percent-level effects. The paper shows that synergy between SKA and Euclid is valuable, and that combining probes is the right strategy. It also suggests that more advanced stages of these surveys—beyond the DR3-like data considered here—may be necessary to settle the question.

For now, the paper's forecast does not rule out ΛCDM; it shows that even a generalized model can remain hard to distinguish from it at these stages. But as SKA comes online and Euclid continues its survey, they will listen ever more closely for that whisper beneath the hurricane. The answer may take years, but the instruments are being built to hear it.