Cloudy Mornings, Clear Evenings: JWST Sees Two Faces of a Giant Exoplanet

On a giant planet called WASP-94A b, the weather forecast depends on which edge of the world you watch. As the planet crosses the face of its star, the leading edge—the morning limb—is wrapped in high clouds. The trailing edge—the evening limb—is clearer and hotter, with water vapor absorbing starlight that filters through its atmosphere. That is the central finding from new James Webb Space Telescope observations, and it turns a familiar exoplanet problem into a story about alien weather.

WASP-94A b is a hot Jupiter, a gas giant that orbits close to its star. It has about 0.456 times Jupiter's mass and 1.72 times Jupiter's radius, and it circles an F8-type star every 3.95 days. The planet is expected to be tidally locked, with one hemisphere facing the star, so it has a permanent day side, a permanent night side, and two boundary regions: morning and evening. In a paper posted to arXiv, researchers report that those two boundary regions are not the same.

The puzzle is aerosols. Tiny particles—clouds or hazes—are common in exoplanet atmospheres, but their origin is uncertain. Are they mineral clouds that condense as gas cools? Or are they photochemical hazes, produced when ultraviolet starlight drives chemical reactions? The answer matters because aerosols mute or reshape the absorption features astronomers use to measure a planet's chemical composition.

A transmission spectrum split into morning and evening

JWST's NIRISS instrument observed WASP-94A b during a transit, when the planet passed in front of its star. In that geometry, a small fraction of starlight skims the planet's atmosphere. Molecules absorb specific wavelengths, leaving fingerprints in the spectrum. The team used limb-resolved transmission spectroscopy: instead of treating the planet as a perfect sphere, they measured separate transit depths for the leading and trailing limbs at wavelengths from 0.8 to 2.8 micrometers.

The data preferred an asymmetric-limb model over a spherical one at about 6 sigma—a strong statistical sign that the two edges differ. The morning limb showed a cloud-opacity signature at 11 sigma and almost no gas absorption. The evening limb showed strong water-vapor absorption at 10 sigma and little scattering slope. In other words, one side is overcast; the other is relatively clear.

Clouds that form on the night and evaporate by evening

The retrieved atmosphere explains why. The morning limb is cooler, so mineral cloud particles—likely iron and magnesium silicate—can form deeper down and be lofted high by vertical mixing. The observations probe the morning limb at low pressures, roughly 0.01 to 0.001 millibar, and its spectrum is dominated by cloud opacity, with little gaseous absorption. The evening limb is hotter, and its spectrum probes pressures between about 0.01 and 4 millibars. When cloud particles circulate from the cooler morning side to the hotter evening side, they evaporate. The retrieval infers a limb-to-limb temperature difference of 448 ± 78 K, with a 3-sigma lower limit of 280 K.

A 3D general circulation model—a computer simulation of the planet's global winds and temperatures—reproduces the picture. It finds a planet-wide equatorial jet; nightside condensates can be carried to the morning terminator, and the fastest horizontal transport of cloud particles from the morning to the evening terminator takes about 1.15 to 2.2 days. The model's temperature difference is about 350 K at 1 millibar, in line with the observationally inferred value. The model also suggests that the morning terminator should be cloudy while the evening terminator is relatively clear.

That circulation pattern is the key to distinguishing clouds from hazes. Photochemical hazes are made on the UV-lit day side. If they were the main aerosols, winds would carry them toward the evening terminator before the morning terminator, so the evening side should be equally or more obscured. The observations show the opposite. The team also compared the morning limb spectrum with several haze species and found that a condensate-cloud model was preferred at greater than 4 sigma. The result supports a picture in which clouds form on the cooler night side, drift into the morning, and burn off in the hotter evening.

The bias that reaches beyond one planet

Why should anyone beyond exoplanet weather fans care? Because ignoring this asymmetry can corrupt the chemistry. When the researchers treated WASP-94A b as a sphere, the combined spectrum diluted the water feature and changed the inferred metallicity—the abundance of elements heavier than helium—to [M/H] = +1.937 ± 0.073. The limb-resolved analysis instead gave [M/H] = +0.31 ± 0.32, a 5-sigma inconsistency. The spherical analysis also altered estimates of the carbon-to-oxygen ratio and vertical mixing.

The implications stretch beyond this one planet. Many transiting exoplanets have been observed with Hubble's WFC3 instrument and analyzed as if their limbs were symmetric. If day-night cloud cycling is common, those water-vapor measurements could be diluted to varying degrees, biasing the inferred compositions of a whole population. The effect may also matter for smaller sub-Neptunes and terrestrial planets, where aerosols are expected to be important and where future missions hope to search for biosignatures.

Where the cloud picture still blurs

The study comes with caveats. It is a preprint, and the atmospheric temperatures and cloud properties are inferred through retrieval models—models fitted to the spectrum—rather than measured directly. No single cloud species produces an unmistakable absorption feature in these data; the cloud composition is inferred from the spectrum's shape and from physical expectations. The 3D circulation model does not include radiatively active clouds, meaning clouds that can affect the model's heating and cooling, and stops at 1 millibar, while the observations probe lower pressures. Stellar activity can sometimes mimic aerosol signatures, though the authors argue that the hot host star and the one-sided water detection make that unlikely.

Even so, WASP-94A b has become a test case for a broader idea: a planet's atmosphere is not one thing. It has a morning and an evening, a leading edge and a trailing edge, and the difference between them can carry the signature of winds, condensation, and evaporation. The next step is to see how many other worlds have two skies instead of one.