A Star in Andromeda Vanished Without a Bright Supernova. Did It Become a Black Hole?

In 2014, a star in the Andromeda galaxy (M31) began to brighten in mid-infrared light. This was not a normal bright optical supernova. Over the next few years, its visible light disappeared, and its total energy output—bolometric luminosity, or energy emitted across all wavelengths—fell by at least a factor of ten. A preprint study argues that this quiet vanishing act is the signature of something astronomers have long sought: the birth of a black hole. The black hole itself was not seen directly; it is inferred from the fading and from models.

A star in M31 that dimmed without a bright supernova

Massive stars, those born with more than about ten times the Sun's mass, usually end their lives in core-collapse supernovae. Their cores collapse, a shock wave can tear the star apart, and a neutron star—a dense compact remnant—is often left behind. But if the shock fails to eject the star's outer envelope, most of that material can fall back. That can produce a black hole. Direct observations of black hole formation have remained inconclusive because such events are faint, brief, or hidden by dust. M31-2014-DS1 offers a rare nearby case.

The discovery came from NEOWISE, a space telescope that surveys the whole sky in mid-infrared light, wavelengths that reveal warm dust. By subtracting older images from newer ones, astronomers spotted a faint brightening at the position of a known star in M31. The source brightened by about 50 percent in the mid-infrared over roughly two years starting in 2014. For about 1,000 days after the brightening began, its total luminosity stayed nearly constant. Then it fell dramatically: over the next 1,000 days, total luminosity dropped by at least a factor of ten, while visible light dropped by more than a factor of 10,000.

Archival observations from the Hubble and Spitzer space telescopes showed what the star had been before: a luminous, cool supergiant surrounded by a dust shell. The data pointed to a hydrogen-depleted star, one that had lost most of its outer hydrogen envelope. Stellar models suggest it was born with about 20 solar masses and reached its final burning stage with about 6.7 solar masses, wrapped in a thin hydrogen layer of only about 0.55 solar masses.

The missing bright outburst and the fallback story

A normal supernova would have produced a bright optical outburst. The team found no such outburst. The optical coverage constrained any missed outburst to be fainter than about 100,000 times the Sun's luminosity and shorter than about 70 days. That limit matters because the energy and duration of such an outburst depend on how much hydrogen-rich material was thrown off. The observations allow at most about 0.03 solar masses to have escaped at the star's escape velocity—the speed needed to break free of its gravity—or up to roughly 0.3 to 1 solar mass if the material moved much faster. Since the progenitor contained about 6.7 solar masses, those constraints imply that most of the star did not escape. Its core collapsed, and the remaining material exceeded the maximum mass of a neutron star, pointing to a black hole.

The puzzle is timing. The star's outer layers should have free-fallen inward in about 180 days. Instead, the luminosity faded over about 1,000 days. That mismatch suggests a shock injected energy into the envelope, delaying the fallback. Models with shock energies between about 10^47 and 10^49 erg reproduce the observed plateau and decline. During the plateau, the emerging luminosity stayed near 30 to 50 percent of the Eddington limit, the brightness at which outward radiation pressure balances gravity for accreting matter. As the infall rate dropped, the luminosity fell with it. In the best-fitting picture, about 98 percent of the stellar mass collapsed into a black hole of roughly 6.5 solar masses.

The weak shock did not leave the scene empty. It unbound about 0.1 solar masses of material. As that ejecta expanded and cooled, it formed new hot dust at roughly 650 days after the ejection, matching the mid-infrared brightening. The new dust shell also deepened the obscuration, explaining why the star vanished in visible light. The amount of new dust, about 10^-4 solar masses, agrees with the spectral energy distribution—a measurement of brightness across wavelengths—seen in later observations.

A second candidate and what remains unproven

M31-2014-DS1 is not alone. Astronomers had previously identified NGC 6946-BH1, another disappearing supergiant in a different galaxy. That object did show a luminous optical outburst and later developed an expanding dusty envelope, making it more complex. The new analysis models its progenitor as a hydrogen-depleted star with a larger residual hydrogen envelope of about 1.4 solar masses and a final mass near 10 solar masses. That model produces a longer fading timescale of a few thousand days, consistent with observations of NGC 6946-BH1, including recent JWST data. Together, the two objects suggest an emerging class: massive stellar deaths that may form black holes from stripped stars, without the bright supernova usually expected.

The black hole itself has not been seen directly. X-ray observations with Chandra, NuSTAR, and Swift found no emission from M31-2014-DS1, but the models suggest the newborn black hole was heavily obscured by gas and dust at those times. The exact time of collapse is not well constrained. The shock energy and dust formation details remain uncertain, and the conclusion rests on stellar and fallback models rather than a direct image of the event. NGC 6946-BH1 also has an alternative explanation: it could have been a stellar merger viewed through a dusty torus. The new paper favors the failed-supernova picture for both objects, but the case is not closed. The work is a preprint and has not yet completed peer review.

Andromeda is the nearest Milky Way–like galaxy to our own, about 2.5 million light-years away. The last known supernova there was seen in 1885. If M31-2014-DS1 truly marked a black hole birth, it was a different kind of death: a star that swallowed its own explosion and disappeared behind a veil of dust. Future observations could catch the next one. Neutrinos, gravitational waves, and infrared or X-ray light might one day reveal the moment a massive star goes quiet and leaves a black hole behind. For now, the evidence is an absence, a star missing from the sky, and a new dark object inferred in its place.